You are viewing the chat in desktop mode. Click here to switch to mobile view.
X
Return toCapitalist Times
April 2025 Capitalist Times Live Chat
powered byJotCast
Mike C.
2:35
2. There’s a lot of discussion of multi-decadal cycles in play (e.g., Ray Dalio, The Fourth Turning fans, etc.). With reference to this odd moment in history, particularly around the murky goals of tariffs and the impact on the US economy, and pondering if this time different (i.e., the highly unusual pro-cyclic use of deficit spending under Biden, followed by what looks like it might be dismantling of significant international trade systems that were generally efficient and effective), what indicators would you watch to suggest that we’re entering something more profound than a routine bear, with or without recession? What would a more substantial macroeconomic regime change look like, while it was unfolding? 

All the best
AvatarElliott Gue
2:35
Yes, I believe these multi-year cycles are very important and it's something I've been writing about a good deal over on The Free Market Speculator and, of course, Energy & Income Advisor as well.  I call it the Great Cycle. Basically, if you go back through history you'll see long periods when stocks -- in particular US stocks -- outperform everything else. Towards the end of these periods, you get a lot of chatter about US exceptionalism, stocks look expensive using standard valuation metrics and people start talking about how those valuation metrics don't apply because "this time it's different." That was true back in the late 1990s. No one cared about anything but the Nasdaq and stocks like Cisco. I remember those days well. I wasn't around in the late 1960s, but I've studied that environment at some length and we had the "Nifty 50" stocks -- the idea being these big American companies were one decision stocks that you could just buy and hold. At any rate, historically these periods are characterized by
AvatarElliott Gue
2:35
weak commodity prices and a strong dollar. Now, following these periods, you tend to get multi-year cycles where equities underperform -- in the 70s they were down in real terms and in the 1998-2012 period stocks were flat. In these cycles, commodities "work," you'll generally see a weaker dollar and international stocks outperform US (in at least some cases). Now, I have some good news and some bad news. The good news is that these big cycles are very profitable -- in the 1998-2012 period, for example, if you were in energy stocks, precious metals and agriculture names, you were making some nice gains while those who bought and held tech -- the hot group in the late 90s--got crushed. The bad news is that these cycles are slow and uneven to the point that it's tough to recognize what's happening in real time. So, you'll get periods within these cycles where stocks are strong and commodities correct. Not all commodities move in the same direction at the same time, etc. So, they can be hard to stick with.
2:36
My view is that this process has been underway since about 2020-22. And, given the normal timing of 12 to 15 years, I think you can expect this cycle to endure into the 2030s.
My point is that I do think this is a more important macro regime change than just a normal cyclical adjustment. In prior cycles like this – 1968-1982 and 1998-2012 – there were actually multiple cycles within the cycle. 3 or 4 recessions in 1968-1982 depending on whether you count 1980-82 as two cycles or just the 1. In 1998 to 2012 we had 2 recessions, including one of the worst since the Great Depression.
So, I think making money in the broader stock market will likely require staying on top of the economic indicators to try to participate in some of these shorter more volatile bull market cycles – much like 1974-1979 and 2002-2007.
Mike C.
2:36
Good morning Roger, Elliott, and Sherry –
Thanks as always for being a solid, reliable, steady source of information and perspective in these times!
A couple of questions for today’s chat:
  1. Roger lists a hedging position in the aggressive CUI portfolio. With Elliott’s sense of a 50% chance of recession, can you recommend an easy/convenient approach to hedging the EIA portfolio (with or without options)?
AvatarRoger Conrad
2:36
Hi Mike

That's a great question. We haven't recommended anything at this time for a couple reasons: 1) We believe we're still in an energy supercycle that will carry all of the model portfolio stocks as much as 2-3X current prices, (2) We hold only the highest quality names across the various energy sub-sectors and have continue to advise the sale of weaker companies--everything we have will weather and likely emerge stronger (at rivals' expense) from a recession/further decline in energy prices and (3) We have a recommended cash position in the model portfolio, which we've added to with sales/partial sales of positions that have previously run to new heights.

For a long-term investor who wants to build wealth in this upcycle, this is the strategy we recommend. We may look to a hedge position at some point in the future. But at this point, we view this pullback as an opportunity to buy good companies.
Jack A.
2:43
Hi Elliott:

Baker Hughes has gone down 20% in the last month.... What do you attribute its fall to? Do you feel all the good news is already baked into the company? Do you feel future orders will increase or have all the LNG facilities that will be built have already been announced, and people are not expecting much upward potential?

Thanks
AvatarRoger Conrad
2:43
Hi Jack. We would attribute the fall to general selling of energy stocks with oil prices slipping under $60/bbl.

But Baker Hughes actually posted some pretty solid Q1 results and guidance--as we noted in the "Trending Topics" we posted last week and is now on the EIA website. Shares have taken a hit along with the rest of the energy sector. But there's no sign the key drivers of its recent growth--including new contracts related to LNG export facilities--are sputtering out. In fact, the company is now getting data center related business. We see the drop in price as another opportunity to build positions.

One word about LNG export facilities--so far, no one has built anything that's not pre-contracted. Historically, upcycles only end when enough developers adopt a "built it and they will come" approach--as in the midstream business in 2014-15. And we're a long way from there.
Jack A
2:49
Hi Elliott:

Along with the market, there has been a pull back in prices of the pipeline stocks. In line with your natural gas thesis, and at today's prices, what do you feel is a better investment, your favorite pipeline company or Expand Energy? AND, at today's prices, what IS your favorite pipeline company?

Thanks for your advice
AvatarRoger Conrad
2:49
Hi Jack. You're really talking about apples and oranges. Pipeline companies generally produce steadier dividends. And the biggest and strongest--which the EIA model is 100% focused on--actually have utility-like safety qualities, which will keep their dividends rising in a possible recession later this year.

Stocks of the strongest pipeline companies have produced strong returns the last five years and I think there's more to come. But producers like EXE are always going to offer more upside from the energy supercycle. As for pipeline stocks, I would suggest looking at Energy Transfer yielding nearly 8% or Plains at almost 9%. But really all of the best midstreams are in the EIA portfolio, as they've been the past decade or so.
Lee O.
2:55
you mentioned last chat you would be covering canadian energy soon,i own trp and sobo and would like to ad one or two other stocks. when will this report drop or could you suggest some?
AvatarRoger Conrad
2:55
Hi Lee. As I indicated above, we're pretty bullish on Canadian energy stocks--especially natural gas, which is about to get a huge lift from the opening of the LNG Canada export facility on the Pacific coast. TC Energy is operator and largest owner of Coastal GasLink, bringing very cheap natural gas from the Montney Shale in British Columbia. Earnings are tomorrow, South Bow's results are May 15. Both are still up solidly for 2025. If you're looking for another Canadian midstream, I would suggest Pembina (May 8 earnings), the number 3 midstream in Canada with considerable leverage to oil and LPG/NGLs exports.

We talked about Canadian energy in the roundtable discussion in this month's issue of EIA. Look for something more focused in the near future.
James
2:55
Hi Elliott, can you give us your thoughts on SLB earnings and stock action.  It's been a brutal bear market for SLB hitting multi-year lows.
AvatarElliott Gue
2:55
Management sounded cautious about growth on the call, but reaffirmed commitment to returning capital to shareholders. Broadly, the issue here is the upstream spending cycle -- spending on oil and gas exploration and development outside North America where SLB dominates. The market has been concerned about the intermediate term outlook since 2023, because the oil market looks comfortably supplied right now. My view is that the market is too pessimistic oil. US oil production growth estimates are ridiculously elevated and the longer oil stays in the low $60s, the more likely you are to see an outright drop in US oil production. OPEC is going ahead with production increases (a return of bbl to the market) but that's misleading -- only Saudi and UAE have real spare capacity and the longer oil stays where it is the more likely you'll see OPEC adopt a more aggressive supply management plan (like 2020). SLB bottomed under $11 in 2020 and rallied to about $60 at the highs in 2023. Today we've given back about half
AvatarElliott Gue
2:55
the gains from the 2020 lows. My view remains that SLB is a high quality company that will see higher highs as the oil cycle turns positive again. The picture is murky right now but SLB is managing well against a tough macro. The stock might require some patience, but over a 12 to 24 month time frame I think the current quote will look good. Near-term my favorite theme is natural gas, which is likely to be more defensive in recession as well.
Frank C.
3:00
Hi guys
I sold half of my OKE at about $108, would now be a good time to get back in?
AvatarRoger Conrad
3:00
Hi Frank. We've had a highest recommended entry point for ONEOK of 80--looks like it could get there.

I didn't have a problem with the Q1 results and affirmation of guidance. NGL raw feed volume growth in the Rockies (15%) is certainly encouraging as is the execution of cost synergies from recent acquisitions. And I think the commentary you're seeing about the results being "disappointing" is pretty classic CYA from those who recommended buying where you very wisely took money off the table--kudos for that!

That said, I think we can afford to be patient or even a little greedy with fresh money--as it very much looks like we'll see a price under 80 in the near future. We're nearly there now.
Frank C.
3:08
I have a position in NEE-PR because I like the exposure to NEE and the dividend of the preferred. I believe there is some future conversion date but I don't know the details. Please explain. What are the factors to decide which to continue accumulating?
AvatarRoger Conrad
3:08
It sounds like you're asking about the "equity units" NextEra issued in June 2024. These will mandatorily convert into common shares of NextEra on June 1, 2027. The maximum number of shares is 0.6915 and the minimum is 0.5532, with the amount to be determined by the price of NEE at the conversion date--and a "target" value of $50 per equity unit. If NEE trades at $90.38 or higher, you get the minimum number of shares. If it trades at $72.30 or lower (as NEE does now), you get the maximum shares. Anything in between, the number of shares received is adjusted.

NEE is a top recommendation of mine, especially after robust Q1 results and guidance. And my view is the stock will be trading at a higher price in two years. You will get more capital appreciation buying the common shares rather than the equity units now--but the yield is higher with the equity units.
Susan P
3:12
Free Market Speculator's portfolio includes iShares Fallen Angels Bond ETF (FALN). Over the past few weeks, you've estimated the likelihood of a recession hovers around 50:50. FALN focuses on the best of the below investment-grade bonds and has a resilient track-record over its 8yrs. I am wondering how you'd approach FALN if the economy slows down? If rates are lowered that should help FALN; at the same time, deteriorating credit conditions could negatively impact its underlying holdings. Thanks for your thoughts.

Wondering if Ramco Resources (METC) has any appeal? It seems to have political tailwinds (e.g. domestic steel activity may increase, Wyoming granted METC $ to pursue the potential of rare earth minerals in one of its mines, Joe Manchin just joined the Board). This Admin "clean coal" focus, has helped Alliance Resources (thermal coal) continue its run up in price. I am wondering if Ramco has ever made it, or could make it, into EIA's portfolio? Thank you.
AvatarElliott Gue
3:12
Thanks for the questions. Generally, if there's a recession you're likely to see those credit spreads blow out and that's historically not good news for high yield debt because credit concerns outweigh the positive impact of lower rates.

Since most Fallen Angel bonds are rated just under investment grade -- i.e. higher credit quality -- I would expect them to outperform the broader high yield market. The Bloomberg Index that tracks Fallen Angels performed better than high yield in the 2006-08 period and a bit worse than the investment grade index. However, all three indices -- junk, fallen angels and IG debt -- were down in that recession.

Now 2007-09 was a bad recession, so that probably overstates the risk. And junk performed somewhat better in 2001, but was still down in that year.

Bottom line is that if I start to see more evidence of a pass through in economic weakness from the soft data to the hard data, I'd be inclined to reduce the allocation to FALN. Treasuries are what works best in a
AvatarElliott Gue
3:12
recession. The flip side of that is that FALN is the sort of name you definitely want to watch during an economic downturn. Junk bonds tend to bottom out a little ahead of stocks -- ie. in late 2008 versus early 2009 in that cycle -- and you can pick up some impressive yields near those lows. Junk bonds returned more than the S&P 500 from late 2008 to late 2009.
gurst
3:14
Any update on AES?
AvatarRoger Conrad
3:14
There's really not much to report on AES at this time, other than the fact that as I write this it's actually selling for less than $10 a share--a (still growing and well protected) yield of 7% plus, and 4.2X expected next 12 months earnings. That's some very low investor expectations ahead of Q1 earnings and updated guidance  still expected later this week.

I suspect the main reasons are concerns about higher for longer interest rates, a potential global recession that could hit non-US operations and Trump Administration hostility to renewable energy. But I'm expecting another solid quarter of bringing new production capacity on stream that's contracted to Big Tech, as we saw with NextEra Energy last week, along with cost cutting success and debt reduction. I also think they'll stick to long-term guidance, which is based on investment in pre-contracted generation, as well as regulated utility T&D.
AvatarElliott Gue
3:15
As for METC, I tend to focus more on the thermal coal market in EIA because of the direct energy connection. And I am not very familiar with METC. But, I do follow steel and I will add METC to my list of names to have a closer look at.
Alex M.
3:17
Hi Roger.  Would you consider adding Star Group (SGU) to your utility coverage?  It provides home heating oil and propane.  Thanks.
AvatarRoger Conrad
3:17
Hi Alex. Actually, it looks at lot more appropriate for Energy and Income Advisor's MLPs and Midstream coverage universe. Thanks for the suggestion.

This is still a very dispersed business with considerable opportunities for consolidation. And with less than $500 mil market cap, Star Group would seem to be a prospective takeover target. The dividend increase announced earlier this month is a good sign for FYQ2 results due out in the next few days.
Lee
3:25
Do you have any idea how many refineries VLO has, I read somewhere that they are closing one in Calif.
AvatarElliott Gue
3:25
VLO has 15 refineries, 13 in the US, 1 in Canada and 1 in the UK (Wales specifically). Total throughput capacity is 3.2 million bbl/day and around 2.7 million bbl/day of that is in the US.

California is like a different planet when it comes to the energy industry for a number of reasons. Indeed, you could say that Northern and Southern Calif. are basically two different planets from each other as well. VLO has two facilities in the Golden State, Benicia in the San Francisco area and Wilmington down near LA. They're closing Benicia by April of next year due to high costs and a "challenging" regulatory environment. That's important for the State and California is already badly short of capacity, but it's not a huge deal for VLO since both of their Calif. refiners account for only around 11 or 12% of their US throughput capacity. VLO is mainly a Gulf Coast story which is home to about three-quarters of their capacity.
Guest
3:25
Hello, Thanks for these chats. Do you have an opinion on CIVI ? Thanks.
AvatarRoger Conrad
3:25
Thank you for joining us today!

First off, Civitas' current 18.4% yield posted on many services include several "special cash" payments made in the last 12 months. And the company has not made one of these since last September. Based on the regular cash dividend of 50 cents, the yield is a considerably more modest 7.4%. Second, this is a relatively small producer with property in a prolific basin (Delaware of the Permian) but also profits that closely track energy prices. And it pays out an aggressive portion in dividends, meaning if profits drop so will the payout. And finally, output is "oily," meaning margins are going to be more negatively affected by lower oil prices than helped by higher gas prices in Q1.

This is a company we may pick up as a producer paying a variable rate dividend--a practice we like. But at this point, the more compelling values for both yield and capital appreciation are in the EIA model portfolio.
Alex M.
3:37
Hi Roger.  EIX just released earnings and the stock is currently down over 9%.  Is there anything in the press release that you find concerning that could explain the price movement?  Thanks.
AvatarRoger Conrad
3:37
Hi Alex. Edison's actual Q1 earnings were quite solid--"core" which excludes one time factors were up 21.2%--reflecting rate base growth primarily. And management reiterated previous 2025 earnings guidance of $5.94 to $6.34 per share, as well as growth of 5-7% through 2028.

What I think the stock is reacting to today is (1) The company has not received a decision yet in its 2025 general rate case, meaning uncertainty remains about what that will be and (2) a statement in the guidance call from management that "it is probable" that Edison will "incur material losses in connection with the Eaton Fire." That statement is light of the fact that no evidence has emerged to exonerate the company's equipment as a potential source of ignition, even though nothing has emerged to show it is at fault.

If Edison equipment is implicated, the company will still have access to $20 bil plus from the state Wildfire Insurance Fund--and it faces a maximum of $4 bil outside what it can recover if its found negligent.
AvatarRoger Conrad
3:38
We're a long way from Edison being found at fault let alone negligent. And in any case, the current price of the stock certainly reflects the risk. But until there's more clarity on these matters, there will be a cloud over this stock--and that's basically what we saw today.
Alex M.
3:49
Hi Roger.  What are your thoughts on Comcast's latest results?  They are still losing broadband and video subscribers.  I find it interesting that the bad earnings news hit, but the stock hasn't continued to plunge.  Wondering what you think.  Thanks.
AvatarRoger Conrad
3:49
Comcast shares are currently down about -8% this year to date including dividends, not that far behind the S&P 500. But I think the game has fundamentally changed for this company: it's growth is coming now from its multi-media and entertainment content business, while its once core network business is shrinking. The primary indicator of that is the loss of broadband customers to cheaper, faster fiber networks owned by the wireless Big 3--AT&T, Verizon and T-Mobile US. And while the company is picking up wireless customers, these are exclusively through an MVNO agreement whereby Comcast essentially rents  Verizon's network. Both companies make money from the deal. But the net result is more people are using Verizon networks and less using Comcast.

Comcast still has a very strong balance sheet and financial position. But going forward, its earnings and cash flow are going to depend more on volatile sources (media) and less on stable ones (networks).
AvatarRoger Conrad
3:50
I think what that means for Comcast is the stock will tend to trade at a lower valuation going forward than what we've seen in the past. 8X earnings looks cheap. But again, those earnings are increasingly from more volatile sources and deserve the lower valuation.
Jeff B
3:54
ET has been in a steady decline YTD about 16%.  Would now be a good time to add to my position.
AvatarRoger Conrad
3:54
Hi Jeff. I think so, Energy Transfer reports Q1 and updates its guidance next week (May 6). And there's every indication we'll see all the strengths we've become accustomed to the past few years--self-funding of conservative investment plans, very strong distribution coverage by free cash flow, debt reduction and solid progress with new projects--including the Lake Charles (La) LNG export facility. I always advise balance and diversification in portfolio management. But Energy Transfer yielding almost 8% again is a great value.
Connecting…