You are viewing the chat in desktop mode. Click here to switch to mobile view.
X
Chat with MLBTR's Steve Adams: 9/23/25
powered byJotCast
Prev Page View Full Chat
Steve Adams
1:35
30-40% of the contract isn't getting anything. Even if you take away the $5MM the Rox are kicking in next season, he's still owed $37MM over two years. Arenado isn't getting two years and $22MM in free agency as a 35-year-old coming off an 80 wRC+. If the Cardinals pay him down to like $5MM per year, maybe someone takes him, but even then, the return is pretty much just going to be salary relief and a nominal warm body.
Topher
1:35
Looking ahead, how is the looming potential (likely) work stoppage going to impact contracts handed out this offseason? More short-term deals likely?
Steve Adams
1:37
I do expect a stoppage in the form of a lockout. I'm not at all convinced said stoppage will actually result in lost games. Manfred isn't going to want that to be his lasting legacy, and neither the owners nor the players want to run into that scenario. The '94 strike caused catastrophic long-term damage to the game's well-being.

So really, I don't think you're going to see too many players shy away from long-term deals. Those deals might be structured such that there's a lower salary in '27 as a potential hedge. Or maybe more contracts with huge signing bonuses, since those aren't impacted by a lockout the way a player's salary would be, but I'm not expecting a big rash of one-year deals while guys gear up to sign long-term post-2027.
1:39
Even if there was a huge portion -- even the entirety -- of the 2027 season lost and you felt like you gamed the system by signing a one-year deal for 2026 ... then you're just a free agent who's probably 31-32 years old hoping to score a long-term deal after owners can claim pandemic-style "biblical" revenue losses again. I wouldn't really want to be on the market under those circumstances.
Optimistic Giants Fan
1:39
Do you think the Giants are happy with what Bryce Eldridge has shown? Low average and high strikeouts looks bad at first, but he also has a 90% hard hit rate and has taken some walks.
Steve Adams
1:41
This should be about what they expected, in my view. He's 20 years old with minimal AAA experience and plenty of strikeout concerns at that level. I think it was fine to give him a look and hope for lightning in a bottle once they pushed back into faint playoff contention, but my expectations were minimal.

He's hitting the ball hard, has mashed at every minor league level, and will likely be just fine going forward. Nothing in his tiny sample of big league games feels like it should change their understandably very bullish outlook on him.
Rays Days
1:42
Even though K Cash’s is contracted through 2030 do you believe a team might be interested in trying to pry him away from the Rays? Will Lowe and Diaz still be with the team next year?
Steve Adams
1:44
I'm sure plenty of teams would love to have Cash managing for them, but it's been like 10 years since a team effectively traded for a manager. I wouldn't spend much time considering that possibility.

I lean yes on Diaz and no on Lowe (traded), but it's the Rays, so can't rule out moving both of them.
Rangers
1:45
Rangers off season outlook this year?⚾️
Steve Adams
1:45
We're starting up our Offseason Outlook series this week!
Andrew R
1:45
Phillies take Arenado and JoJo Romero for Nick Castellanos! And yes, that means letting Bohm go.
Steve Adams
1:48
I understand the fascination regarding an Arenado trade, but I don't think that really helps either party. The Cardinals would want to trade Arenado to free up playing time for younger players. Bringing Castellanos back runs counter to that, as does trading a reasonably valuable asset (Romero) just to shed his salary.

And for the Phillies, Arenado isn't even a clear upgrade over Bohm. They could just release Castellanos, eat the $20MM, non-tender Bohm and sign/acquire a better third base stopgap to Aidan Miller.
Filthy
1:48
Does Albies’ latest hamate injury alter the Braves’ calculations on his option?
Steve Adams
1:48
It's a net $3MM decision and there's a $7MM option (no buyout) on 2027. I can't see any way they decline it.
Jeff in Jersey
1:49
By all accounts, the Mets seem to feel bad luck and poor execution, rather than bad process, led to this year’s terrible 2nd half. Your thoughts? Kinda feels like $58 million in Senga (minors), Manaea (hurt then bad) and Montas (hurt, bad, then hurt) is bad process.
Steve Adams
1:52
In general, I didn't love their offseason slate of pitching additions. Senga's struggles do feel like some degree of bad luck. He was great prior to the hamstring issue and seemingly developed some bad habits while pitching through it/working back from it. I don't think you can account for that exact scenario, but by the same token, he also missed most of last year with injury so there should have been (and was) some emphasis on building up the depth.

The Montas signing was one of the weirdest deals of the offseason and maybe my most immediately negative reaction to any free agent deal of the winter. Holmes, Canning, Montas ... I know today's front offices are terrified of getting burned by an undesirable long-term deal, but I think so often that just leads to them overpaying on undesirable short-term deals and then needing to go back to the market.
1:53
That's not to disparage the Holmes deal really, which has worked out as well as could be hoped, but it's just another instance of trying to kind of gin up a below-market value and getting kind of cute to do so. On its own, fine, but when it's paired with a bunch of moderately priced upside plays, the quantity-over-quality approach just becomes more glaring. If you don't want to spend on a Corbin Burnes, that's totally fine, but for me the move at that point is tapping into the farm to make a play on the trade market rather than throwing a bunch of short-term commitments and hoping some stick.
AA
1:54
Is Bichette a possibility for the Braves? A lot of money coming off the books this year.
Steve Adams
1:54
The Braves haven't given out more than $65MM to a free agent (Ozuna) under Alex Anthopoulos. I suppose they went after Aaron Nola, but in general, Bichette is just so far beyond what they've been willing to do.
1:55
They wouldn't commit long-term to Fried, Swanson, Freeman ... but they'll push $200MM for Bichette? I don't see it.
Mike Elias
1:55
Am I really going to trade Adley?
Steve Adams
1:56
I don't think it's any kind of given, but I expect teams to inquire and the Orioles to at least give it consideration, particularly if it means getting some notable starting pitching coming back.
Cubs options
1:56
Cubs have 3 pretty fascinating option choices after the year on Imanaga (the weird one), Rea ($4 million), and Kittredge ($9 mil I think?), where do you see them landing on each?
Steve Adams
1:59
Imanaga will be picked up (all three years). I lean toward Kittredge being exercised and Rea being bought out.

Kittredge's option is $9MM but with a $1MM buyout, so it's a net $8MM that I think they'll deem reasonable enough.

Rea's option is $6MM with a $750K buyout. It's a net $5.25MM decision. I think that's more than justifiable based on how he's pitched, but he's a 35-year-old with below-average bat-missing ability and a relatively pedestrian fastball.

I think Rea is certainly worth that cost, but that was also true last year when the Brewers put him on waivers at a similar price point and no one claimed him. His age and skill set isn't something today's front offices like to commit money to right out of the gate in the offseason.
Pirates
1:59
Pirates trade Keller to the Angels for OHoppe, Adell and Neto.   Who says no?
Steve Adams
1:59
Angels wouldn't do Neto straight up for Keller, let alone that trio.
Mariners
2:01
Thoughts on a Naylor and or Suarez resigning with us. Contract size and years?
Steve Adams
2:02
Mariners haven't given a free-agent hitter more than two years and $24MM (Mitch Garver) under Jerry Dipoto. Jerry said on our podcast -- thanks for coming on, Jerry! -- that they're interested in re-signing Naylor, but I can't help wondering if the length of the deal will just go beyond where they prefer to operate.

Suarez's contract is going to be kind of naturally capped by his age (35), so in a weird, roundabout way I can almost see him as a more realistic target since he'll come with less long-term risk.
White Sox Fan
2:03
Any value to a Robert for Bohm trade if/when Sox pick up Robert's option? This helps needs for both teams
Steve Adams
2:03
Bohm is only controlled through 2026. That trade doesn't do the White Sox any good.
IM
2:03
Will Mayo and/or Mountcastle be on the O's in 2025 or does Basallo play first and M+M get traded for pitching?
Steve Adams
2:05
Mountcastle isn't going to bring much in the way of pitching. He's a non-tender candidate.

Mayo, I could see them trading, but his stock has plummeted this year, just as Kjerstad's has over the past 18 months or so.

(Trade your prospects!)
2:07
I’ve got to call it for the week.

Tim’s mailbag will run tomorrow, and Anthony will have a subscriber chat on Friday. I’m on X @Adams_Steve and Bluesky @adams-steve.bsky.social.

If you want more opinions from the MLBTR team, you can learn about our Front Office subscription package and sign up here. In addition to ad-free viewing on the site and in the app, you’ll get weekly analysis/opinion columns from Anthony Franco and myself, a weekly mailbag column from Tim Dierkes, weekly fantasy baseball chats and columns with Nicklaus Gaut, weekly subscriber-only chats with Anthony and with me (where your odds of getting a question answered are much higher), extra insight from Darragh McDonald, access to our Contract Tracker (a vital offseason resource) our Agency Database, our GM Tracker, our Offseason Outlook series (starting late this week) and more.

Thanks everyone, and enjoy your week!
Connecting…