You are viewing the chat in desktop mode. Click here to switch to mobile view.
X
RosterResource Chat - 1/24/25
powered byJotCast
View Full Chat Next Page
AvatarJason Martinez
2:01
Welcome to the RosterResource Live Chat! Jon will be joining us in a few minutes and then I might take a short break to update the Nationals page with news just breaking that they've signed Shinnosuke Ogasawara.
David Stearns
2:01
I see you have Profar batting second behind Harris wouldn’t it stand to reason for him to leg off given his on base skills?
AvatarJason Martinez
2:02
Profar is very good at 1 or 2. He was great in he 3 spot for the Padres. My current projection is based on how the season finished with Harris in the leadoff spot and having something like an .825 OPS over his final 200 PAs. Still a low OBP and better-suited for 6th spot, but Albies is coming off a down season so I have him there for now.
Cyrus
2:02
If the Jays really sign Alonso: How are you projecting the playtime in the infield?
AvatarJason Martinez
2:03
I already have Vlad Jr. with about 10-12% of PT at 3B. Not sure we'll hear right away if it could be more if they signed Alonso. As things stand, I'd put Alonso as the primary DH and move Will Wagner into a bench role, where he could still be valuable as a lefty bat who plays 2-4 times per week.
2:05
More specifically to playing time, Vlad Jr. and Santander would also get DH at-bats and Alonso would still get some time at 1B. But, more importantly, there are plenty of at-bats available for one more big bat.
Cyrus
2:05
Which moves would the Pirates and Reds have to do to really have a chance for the division?
AvatarJon Becker
2:07
I think it's actually the same for both teams: middle-of-the-order hitting and bullpen depth. I like both of their rotations (the Pirates' especially) but each team only has a couple hitters I really wouldn't want to face (Elly and McLain assuming he picks up where he left off; Reynolds and Cruz) and shallow-looking bullpens, though I think the Pirates adding Ferguson was a nice move and the Reds could benefit from sending Ashcraft into short relief and telling him to just air it out.
drplantwrench
2:08
there continues to be very vague rumors connecting alonso to the angels. given they have nolan and soler how would that even work??
AvatarJason Martinez
2:09
It's not out of the question. Would probably preclude a Taylor Ward or Jo Adell trade to open a corner OF spot for Soler. Schanuel played some OF in college. Not sure they'd go that route. Defense would be worse. But more power. More fun.
#4 starters
2:10
What's your take on these #4 starters, all of which seem to have new-found flaws: JP Sears is in a new, smaller balpark. Luis L. Ortiz is on a new time. Casey Mize is on the same team in the same ballpark, but is there any hope that the former top prospect will move up a notch in the rotation?
AvatarJon Becker
2:12
Ortiz would be my favorite here, then Sears, then Mize. Ortiz was really good last year and is going to a great pitching development team that could help him unlock even more; Sears is at minimum a nice innings-eater, I'm just not sure how Sacramento's park factors will play compared to Oakland; Mize being another year removed from injury helps in theory, but even last year he couldn't stay healthy and the stuff was inconsistent from what I saw.
Farhandrew Zaidman
2:12
Dodgers have a real 40 man crunch problem. Who is most likely to be moved between Brasier, Grove, Knack, Casparius, etc?
AvatarJason Martinez
2:14
Sounds like they're trying to move Brasier, which is probably their preference just to give them some more roster flexibility. As things stand, Vesia is the only guy that can be optioned and he's proven himself to be a guy that shouldn't be going to AAA, even for just 15 days at a time.
Farhandrew Zaidman
2:15
If (when) the Mookie at SS experiment ends, do you see them slotting Edman/Kim/Rojas in there, or making a move for a true SS?
AvatarJon Becker
2:17
I don't think it's an experiment, he's been working out all offseason with the plan being to move back there, and part of trading Lux when Kim signed was to keep Mookie at short. Unlike last year, when Heyward was cut loose midseason, there's not an obvious avenue for RF opening back up since Conforto and Teoscar aren't going anywhere. Sending Mookie out to CF to switch with Edman might not be a great idea either.
Mike C
2:17
I know the move just happened minutes ago, but where does Shinnosuke Ogasawara slot into the Nats rotation?
AvatarJason Martinez
2:19
It's not an easy one unless. If the plan is to give Soroka a chance to start, then either DJ Herz is likely the odd man out to begin the season or Ogasawara is in the bullpen.
Phil
2:21
Do the Red Sox need to trade Yoshida to seriously improve in their main areas of need, infield defense and right-handed hitting? How much salary would the Red Sox have to eat? I imagine John Henry wouldn't like being told, we can get Bregman or Arenado but we have to also pay another guy to play for a different team.
AvatarJon Becker
2:23
Not really, even if they view the CBT line as a hard cap (no idea if that's true, just that it's always a possibility), since they're $31M under right now, though moving him would make playing time easier to sort out. Yoshida has three years and $54M left on his contract (plus $1.8M of his signing bonus, which the Red Sox pay regardless), and he'd probably get... 1y/$10M on the open market, maybe? Platoon DHs just aren't worth much, they'd have to eat a massive chunk and/or attach Casas or prospects, or I guess take back a bad contract that fits their roster better, to move him.
Talfred
2:24
Many Red Sox fans believe they should trade Yoshida because, even though he's a good player, he's a bad fit for their roster. Isn't he a bad fit for anyone's roster? An $18 million slap hitter with bad defense and baserunning?
AvatarJason Martinez
2:26
Red Sox are stacked with top prospects very close to the majors so it would make sense for them to move him. But he's a good fit elsewhere, especially if they can eat some of his remaining contract. He had an .832 OPS/134wRC+ vs RHP last season. And the word is that he couldn't play defense because of a previously unreported injury. Would you give a guy like that $18MM/yr? No but maybe they'd have interest if they paid it down to $12MM/yr.
drplantwrench
2:27
my next angels naive idea is that they should sign scherzer to a one-year deal, something like 1 year/$22M. they def need front end SP and if(/when) the season falls apart they can use him as trade bait.  have i gone crazy? should i be talked out of this?
AvatarJon Becker
2:29
That's a lot of cash for Scherzer, who could do slightly better than Verlander, but I don't think close to 50% better is happening. Scherzer's still pretty good when healthy but I'd stop short of calling him front-end — if you're going to give out a deal with that high an AAV to a starter, I think I'd prefer Pivetta or Flaherty even if they'll require more than one-year deals.
Jackson
2:30
Is the Kepler signing enough to move the needle for the Phillies? They are essentially running it back position player wise even though the result of that has not been good
AvatarJason Martinez
2:33
They won 95 games last season, the offense is still stacked, they added Jesus Luzardo, and could have Andrew Painter in the rotation in July. I don't think adding Kepler will move the needle much but he could help stabilize the lineup and they won't have to depend on Johan Rojas as anything more than a 4th OF/defensive replacement.
Fonzie
2:36
With the acquisition of Profar and the looming return of Acuna,  do you think Kelenic will be able to secure and/or hold onto an outfield spot?  Do you think he can take a step forward and fulfill his former elite prospect status?
AvatarJason Martinez
2:38
I think the Profar signing signals the end of the line for Kelenic in regards to whether he can even become an everyday player with the Braves. There's no more room once Acuña is back. He'll have Spring Training and maybe the first month of the season to prove to some other team that he could still fulfill his potential.
Holliday
2:39
Am I right in assuming that this year isn't Jackson Holliday's year, and he'll either be platooned or sent back to AAA?
AvatarJon Becker
2:40
Way too early to limit him to lefties and especially to send him down especially considering he looked good the last couple weeks of the year after changing his leg kick into a toe tap. Maybe he sits against some tough lefties (we have him platooning with Urías right now), though.
mortimer podge
2:41
all of baseball-related media seems united in the thought that the cubs "need" a closer. isn't porter hodge kinda good? is your sense they really just don't want him in the role?
AvatarJason Martinez
2:43
It has less to do with whether Hodge can be a good closer and more to do with having multiple options who could pitch in high-leverage spots. If they sign a veteran closer (Estevez, Robertson, Jansen) or trade for Ryan Pressly, it doesn't mean Hodge won't be in line for saves. But there will be less pressure on him to be the "closer" and he would still go into the season as one of their top high-leverage relievers.
Del Martin
2:45
Is Arraez bouncing back to make him worth the Padres' while? They reportedly need money and $14 million for a 1-1.5 WAR player seems like a terrible use of resources, especially if they end up trading Cease instead.
AvatarJon Becker
2:47
I don't buy that he's his 2023 self but I also don't buy that he's as punchless as his 2024 self either; he hurt his thumb pretty early on in the year and was pretty obviously in pain on a lot of swings. The bigger issue is that he's without a position on defense (he's bad even in his best years), though I guess the Padres have so many open positions that they can just shove him wherever's left.
Ben Shelton
2:47
Do you guys think there's a good chance Preller trades Arraez or Cease? But what kind of return are they realistically looking at besides the obvious salary dump?
AvatarJason Martinez
2:50
My assumption had been that they needed to move Arraez's $14MM so they could sign Profar. And now that Profar signed for $14MM/yr, I'm convinced they can't move Arraez without eating at least $5-6MM. I think he helps a team a lot, but not on his own. It was a combination of Arraez-Profar-Merrill-Solano-Peralta that really made the 2024 offense one of the best (probably the best) of the Petco Park era. Arraez at $14MM is not attractive enough, even to a high strikeout/bad situational hitting team that needs to go in that direction.

Trading Cease would dump salary and likely help them fill 2-3 spots. Makes the most sense.
Guest
2:51
Do you see Michael Conforto being more in an everyday role and not so much a platoon role given his success vs LHP in 2024?
AvatarJon Becker
2:53
Yeah, right now we've got him as a full-timer, even though his 2024 performance deviated from his usual against lefties. They've got other players to work into the fold (Taylor, Rojas, Pages), but they can sit Kim and Muncy sometimes to accomplish that, too. We also have no indication of how the Dodgers will use Ohtani on days he pitches, not to mention the day before or day after.
jaygray007
2:55
As a Pirate fan, i had Profar pinned as the last starter-caliber OF for the pirates to go after.  At this point, where do they pivot?   Is Verdugo even better than Suwinski/Palacios?   I guess a Canha/Grichuk to platoon with them makes sense but your RH platoon guy just isnt gonna move the needle.   How do they salvage this offseason?
AvatarJason Martinez
2:57
Verdugo is more consistent and a good defender. Add a platoon partner like Grichuk or Canha and I'd feel better about their lineup. Suwinski has some upside but they can't go into the season with that big of a question mark. But not many other options out there. David Peralta was very good with the Padres last season and is a great clubhouse guy. But he's 37. Not sure he'll keep that up in an everyday role.
Connecting…