JotCast | Year 5 24th April 2020

Year 5 24th April 2020

Prev Page View Full Chat Next Page

Luke

11:08

to protect wildlife

Hollie

11:08

It wouldent take them a long time to get the water

Grace

11:08

they have taken the trees down and less animals are there

Mr Fairhurst

11:09

Think about jobs and production. What would the problem be if there wasn't any cities or towns there at all?

George

11:09

grow crop for other counties or towns in south america

Joseph R

11:09

to get water easily

Luke

11:10

or to make cash

Joseph A

11:10

to make sure the animals are well

Alex

11:10

Breaking down the rainforest

Joseph R

11:10

people would be poor

Eva Wright

11:10

with what they eat now

Mr Fairhurst

11:10

During the 1800s it was the richest city in South America. Why do you think this was?

Alex

11:10

nowhere for big amount of people to live

Grace

11:10

People will have a hard time making money and then they will be poor

Louis

11:11

The water may overflow if no one is getting it

Eva Wright

11:11

if someone got stranded there they would starve

Luke

11:11

they sell all the crops

Mr Fairhurst

11:11

Pretty much. It was home to lots of rubber plantations.

Sylvie

11:11

yes there is becase of hunters

George

11:11

because there is good farming land

Alex

11:11

trade

Grace

11:11

There where big city’s and lots of jobs for people to make money

Isla

11:11

This would affect housing and industry

Lily

11:11

Because they could sell all the wood and food

Mr Fairhurst

11:12

Have a look at Chile on the map. Is there anything unusual about it?

Amelia Ashton

11:12

Selling food that they fish from the rivers

Eva Wright

11:12

because the hunters might have got a lot of money from killing the animals

Louis

11:12

maybe other countries took over

Mr Fairhurst

11:13

For those of you that missed it, Manaus was so rich because of the rubber plantations. Some of you pointed out that some towns and cities are needed in the rainforest for trade and places to live for workers and for transportation of goods

Joseph A

11:13

because there was a lot of animals so they could poach them and kill them for money

George

11:13

its very long

Alex

11:13

its long and thin

Isla

11:13

It is right on the cost

Luke

11:13

it is very straight

Eva Wright

11:13

It’s a very thin piece of land

Joseph R

11:13

it is has a lot of coastal area

Isla

11:13

Chile is right on the coast

Grace

11:14

it’s right next to the sea and there’s not a lot of land

Mr Fairhurst

11:14

It is a very long thin country? Why do you think this is?

Hollie

11:14

it is near the coast and it is long and thin

Connecting…

Message History

On Off

Your current subscriptions

None

E-mail Address	Chat Owner	Status	Remove

Enter your email address to be notified when Mr Fairhurst hosts a chat